Your deals are not dying in the demo. They are dying in procurement. This audit turns AI compliance into sales collateral: a buyer-facing assurance summary, pre-written questionnaire answers, and engineering tickets mapped to NYC Local Law 144, the EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and EEOC guidance.
As seen in

Four questions. No email required.
1. Does your tool rank or score candidates?
2. Does it ingest audio or video?
3. Does it recommend rejection or advancement?
4. Where are your buyers located?
Compliance is not a legal line item. It is a procurement gate between you and signature.
Security and AI questionnaires stall deals in procurement for weeks
Legal and InfoSec send the same 15 questions to every vendor - and wait
Sales reps improvise answers that create new risk and more follow-up
Buyers in the EU, Illinois, NYC and Colorado now ask for documentation up front
Deals slip a quarter while engineering scrambles for evidence
Assets your sales, legal and engineering teams use immediately - not a PDF that sits in a drive.
A customer-facing, co-branded compliance executive summary your reps attach directly to enterprise proposals.
15 pre-crafted answers for standard enterprise security and algorithmic bias assessments (SIG, CAIQ, and custom buyer questionnaires).
Copy-paste Jira or Linear ticket descriptions - scope, acceptance criteria, priority - so engineering can start the same day.
Your product scored by category against NYC Local Law 144, the EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and EEOC guidance.
Jackye explains each decision, so your team can defend the answers in a live buyer call.
Illustrative excerpts showing the format of the risk matrix and the answer rewrites.
Red - Ranking inputs
Flag: Using graduation year in the ranking algorithm creates age-proxy risk under Illinois HB 3773.
Yellow - Candidate notice
Notice text exists but is not shown before the assessment begins, which is short of NYC Local Law 144 timing.
Green - Human review
A named human reviews every rejection recommendation and the decision is logged.
Weak vendor answer
"Our AI is unbiased and fully compliant with all applicable laws."
Unverifiable, promises a legal outcome, and invites three more rounds of questions from legal.
Defensible enterprise answer
"Our ranking model is tested annually by an independent reviewer for adverse impact across race and sex categories, with results summarised in our bias audit report. Candidates receive notice before assessment, a human reviews every rejection recommendation, and graduation year is excluded from ranking inputs. Documentation is available under NDA."
Specific, evidence-backed, and answers the follow-up questions before they are asked.
Sample content shown for format only. Your report reflects your own product and testing.
You share product scope, target customers and the questionnaires that keep stalling
Research, testing scenarios, and legal mapping against the rules your buyers cite
1-pager, Q&A vault, fix tickets, risk matrix and video walkthrough
I've spent 15+ years building and optimizing talent acquisition systems, with deep expertise in AI-powered hiring tools. I've been featured in the Wall Street Journal and Fortune for my insights on HR technology and compliance. As a LinkedIn Learning instructor, I help thousands of professionals navigate the evolving landscape of AI in hiring. I understand both the technical capabilities and the regulatory complexities that HR tech companies face today.

Priced against the value of one stalled enterprise deal, not against an hourly rate.
$1,500 - $2,000
$4,500 - $6,000
NDAs are welcome. Fast turnaround available.
Tell Jackye what is stuck in procurement. She reads every request personally and replies by email with next steps and a time to talk.
Working through a people, hiring, or talent challenge?